Documents & code
Turn a working archive into a clearly scoped licence.
The right provider depends on what you supply. For an existing dataset, look for a licensing counterparty—not a service that charges to label it.
Explore dataset licensingAn existing assetUseful records, content or observations.
A defensible rights recordOwnership, permissions and use boundaries.
A defined licenceScope, acceptance and delivery terms.
Before the first conversation
An archive does not qualify on size alone. The strongest starting point is useful content, defensible rights and a precise description.
Separate an existing dataset from work you would create on commission. Each follows a different commercial path.
Read the next stepChoose the right counterparty
The distinction is commercial, not semantic. A business that sells labeling work is different from one that licenses an existing archive.
Labels added to supplied data
The customer brings the raw data.
New answers, rubrics and judgments
People contribute commissioned expertise.
Rights to third-party datasets
An owner supplies an existing asset.
A licence to their own collection
The rights holder is the supplier.
Tasks and held-out test sets
Specialist material may fit a narrow need.
From archive to asset
Different formats bring different questions. Find the preparation that fits your collection.
The commercial question
Price follows the licence, not just the file count. Uniqueness, usable rights, buyer fit and the cost of exclusivity all matter. Learn how to read advertised partnership values without treating them as an appraisal.
Understand licensing valueSeparate a real asset-licensing channel from a service that sells labor.
The provenance file that makes ownership and permissions legible.
Acceptance criteria, sample review and what happens when a delivery falls short.
Exclusivity, permitted uses and the limits of a perpetual grant.
A concise description, a rights record and proposed delivery terms make the next discussion more useful.